Two reports count different things.
An ad platform and website report can use different measurement rules. Matching labels do not guarantee matching counts.
Marketing analytics
See what your website, advertising and sales reports measure, where information is missing and which decisions the evidence can support.
These are some of the gaps we can investigate.
An ad platform and website report can use different measurement rules. Matching labels do not guarantee matching counts.
A submitted form may show interest, but it does not establish customer fit, a booking or revenue.
Calls, sales conversations or completed purchases may not appear in the reports used to allocate budget.
Charts show activity without explaining whether the evidence supports increasing spend or changing the customer journey.
Clear definitions, comparable reports and visible gaps give you a firmer basis for a budget discussion.
Each figure is tied to an agreed action, such as an enquiry, booking or sale, so it answers the right question.
You can see whether a difference comes from dates, definitions or recording rules before treating it as an error.
You know which missing information could change the conclusion before you adjust the budget.
An enquiry, booking and sale tell you different things. We review how your business defines these actions and which records are available before using the figures to discuss marketing spend.

We identify the outcome you need to understand before deciding whether to increase marketing spend.
We agree which new contacts count as enquiries. For example, an office tour request shows interest; a booked tour is a later step.
We check the action recorded on your website, its definition and whether the report covers the agreed period.
We review the records your team has of suitable enquiries, bookings or completed sales.
We separate what the available records support from what remains unknown before recommending a change.
We agree which of these areas need review and which information can answer your question.
Business question
What decision should the figures inform?
See what this coversWe agree the business decision, relevant period and actions to review so the investigation addresses your question rather than every available chart.
Recording quality
Is each action recorded once and as intended?
See what this coversWe inspect the definitions and available records for missing or repeated actions. An event label alone does not prove that the intended action was recorded correctly.
Report comparisons
Which figures can fairly be compared?
See what this coversWe compare the reports’ dates, definitions and credit rules, then explain which figures can be compared. Attribution gives credit to recorded interactions; it does not prove that a channel caused a sale.
Reporting recommendations
What does the evidence support, and what should happen next?
See what this coversWe explain the findings, important gaps and recommended next checks. This can help you decide what to investigate or record next without assuming that you need a new dashboard.
We begin by agreeing the question and available information, review the records, then explain the findings and recommended priorities.
We agree the decision you need to make, the period to review and the information your team can share.
We inspect the relevant website, advertising and sales records for differences in definitions, recording rules and missing information.
Aaron explains what the evidence supports, what remains uncertain and which priorities to act on first.
The review brings together the available records, reporting problems and next checks that matter to your decision. Aaron presents the actual findings and recommended priorities to you in slides.
Aaron discusses your business question and the pages or reports you already use. Together, we agree what the review needs from your team and how you will use the findings.

Describe the offer, customer and question that matter to your business.
Identify what can be reviewed and where input from your team is needed.
Agree the outputs and responsibilities. Any implementation is agreed separately.
These questions help us see what you have ready for a first discussion.
Use these questions to clarify scope, responsibilities and the limits of the available information.
They may count different actions, use different date ranges or allocate credit differently. Check those rules before concluding that a tool is wrong.
No. Analytics records a defined action. Your business must separately define whether that contact fits the offer and reaches a useful sales step.
Attribution assigns credit to recorded interactions. It does not establish causation, and missing interactions or sales records limit the conclusions.
First establish what you need to decide and whether the data can answer it. A dashboard may help present the measures, but it does not repair their meaning or completeness.
Our analytics review identifies problems with your data and explains how they affect your decisions. We can scope tracking fixes as additional work. For example, if your enquiry form is counting the same lead twice, the review would flag that problem; implementation would correct the setup and test that each enquiry is counted once.
Document what is known and what is missing. A useful first recommendation may be more consistent recording rather than a claim about marketing performance.
Bring the reports you currently use and the decision they are meant to support. Note the date range and what your team means by an enquiry, order or sale. Confirm which platforms and account access can be reviewed before granting permissions.
Only after checking that the figures describe comparable actions and periods. One report may count button clicks while another counts submitted forms or sales-confirmed contacts. Keep those measures separate unless a reliable connection between them is available.
We review the definitions and available records behind reported actions. The review does not automatically include live tests of forms or purchases. Live testing or changes to the tracking setup must be agreed separately.
It depends on the decisions your team makes and how often meaningful information changes. An initial review can identify useful measures and reporting gaps. Confirm recurring reports, meetings and dashboard maintenance separately rather than assuming they are included.
A practical starting point
Share your question and the information you already have. The first discussion can establish the relevant service and scope.